"Julie's pathbreaking work began when she was in law school, where she published a student comment in the California Law Review that anticipated the patent reform debate over patent trolls by ten years. She has continued to be a leader in the IP field as a litigator at Day Casebeer and now on her own."

Mark A. Lemley
William H. Neukom Professor of Law, Stanford Law School
Director, Stanford Program in Law, Science and Technology

 

 

 

 

Home | For Clients | For Law Firms | About | Practice Areas | Representative Cases | Contact

Commercial and Intellectual Property Litigation

PATENT  TRADEMARK COPYRIGHT CONTRACT AND LICENSE BREACHES
BUSINESS TORTS
FIRST AMENDMENT UNFAIR COMPETITION DAMAGES

 

Big Firm Expertise. Small Firm Values.

About Julie Turner

Since 1997, Julie Turner has been representing both plaintiffs and defendants in intellectual property and commercial litigation matters. She has litigated numerous patent, copyright, trademark and trade secret cases involving a wide range of electronics, software, and pharmaceutical technologies. She has also represented clients in antitrust, defamation, contract and business tort cases. Ms. Turner has significant trial experience, having first-chaired multiple trials without a defeat.
 

Ms. Turner received her J.D. from the Boalt Hall School of Law at the University of California at Berkeley. She graduated in the top 10% of her law school class and is a member of the Order of the Coif. While in law school, Ms. Turner was a member of the High Technology Law Review and the California Law Review, where she served on the executive committee. Ms. Turner also received the American Jurisprudence Award in Constitutional Law and the Jurisprudence Award in Patent Law.


Prior to founding The Turner Law Firm, Ms. Turner was a partner at Day Casebeer Madrid & Batchelder LLP. Ms. Turner is a member of the State Bar of California, the American Bar Association, the American Intellectual Property Law Association, and the American Inns of Court.

Ms. Turner’s law school comment – "The Non-Manufacturing Patent Owner: Toward a Theory of Efficient Infringement," 86 Calif. L. Rev. 179 (1998) – has been cited numerous times, including in law school textbooks, and is required reading in the intellectual property class at Stanford Law School. This comment argued that a court should not automatically presume irreparable harm or issue a permanent injunction to a prevailing patentee who is not himself employing or commercializing the patent. The comment urges for a new judicial approach where the courts assess actual harm to the patentee, rather than relying on a presumption of harm, as well as harm to society resulting from the failure to commercialize. Many of this comment's recommendations were adopted by the Supreme Court in the case of eBay, Inc. v. MercExchange LLC, 547 U.S. ___, 126 S. Ct. 1837 (2006).

Ms. Turner also co-authored with Robert Galvin and Anne Ortel, an article exploring vicarious liability for employers based on unauthorized copyright infringement by employees. This article was published as "The Risks to Corporations from Employees' Online Piracy," in Building and Enforcing Intellectual Property Value: An International Guide for the Boardroom (Globe White Page), 2003.

 

 

Home | For Clients | For Law Firms | About | Practice Areas | Representative Cases | Contact

 

Contact: Julie Turner
Office: 650-494-1530
Fax: 650-472-8028
 jturner@julieturnerlaw.com

 

The contents of this Web page are not intended, and cannot be considered,
as legal advice or opinion. 
©  2007 Julie Turner